Consultation
Case · anonymised under NDARU · Yandex

A construction company: negative content on the brand out of the top 10 in 6 months

Forums, review attacks and court records aggregators held 11 of the top 20 positions for the brand. Sales at a new development were behind plan.

ClientDeveloper, 3 residential projects
TriggerFalling sales at a new project
CauseNegative content in the brand’s top 20
Timeline6 months
Outcome11 → 2 negative links
Top 10 before
Top 10 after
IMG 0121:9
Case cover for “Negative content on a developer’s brand”: an atmospheric shot on the theme, with no faces or identifying details

The situation

IMG 024:3
The moment the problem became visible: a letter from the bank, a pause in negotiations, an AI answer

The sales team noticed buyers arriving at meetings already asking about the company’s “problems”. In Yandex, the top brand results were forums of buyers from an older project, handed over three years late.

Some of the reviews on listing sites were near-identical and had appeared within two weeks, a sign of a coordinated attack.

Main service in this caseRemoval and suppression of negative contentWe remove what can lawfully be removed. The rest we suppress

What the audit found

  • 11 negative results in the brand’s top 20
  • A wave of near-identical reviews within 2 weeks
  • A court records aggregator listing cases closed by settlement
  • The company website did not address questions about the older project
IMG 033:2
Audit excerpt: search results for the name before the work, sensitive data blurred
IMG 043:2
Excerpt from the risk map in the client report

What we did

IMG 053:4
A working moment: documents, correspondence, a week-by-week plan
  1. Month 1

    Audit and legal assessment

    Sorted sources into those to remove, those to suppress and those needing a response.

  2. Months 1–2

    Reviews

    Challenged false reviews through the platforms and responded to genuine ones.

  3. Months 1–4

    Sources

    A section on completed projects with a timeline and documents; coverage in regional media.

  4. Months 2–5

    Suppression

    Promoted accurate sources for branded search queries.

  5. Month 6

    Monitoring

    Moved to ongoing support.

The result

11 → 2negative links in the top 20
38false reviews taken down by platforms
100%of genuine reviews answered
6 mosto stable search results
IMG 0616:9
Search results / AI answer / database record before the work
IMG 0716:9
The same view after the project
A property buyer vets a developer longer than any bank does. An old story should be answered on your own website, not left in the hope that people forget it.Estena’s position

What we did not do

  • We did not remove genuine reviews from buyers
  • We did not publish paid-for positive reviews

Tell us about your situation. We reply within one business day.

The first meeting is free and carries no obligation. We sign an NDA before you share any details.

TELEGRAM  @estena
E-MAIL    hello@estena.agency
OFFICES   Moscow · Tbilisi · Dubai

By clicking the button, you agree to our privacy policy.