Removal and suppression of unwanted information
First we remove what can lawfully be removed: inaccurate, outdated or unlawful content. The rest we push off the first page with truthful sources, so the negative content no longer shows up in search results or AI answers.
IMG 0121:9Why it matters now
IMG 024:3Negative content rarely disappears on its own. Forums, court-record aggregators, anonymous channels and copies of articles stay on the first page for years, because there is little else about you.
“Removing everything” is impossible, and those who promise it usually risk the Streisand effect. What works is targeted legal removal where there are grounds, and suppression where there are none.
Before we start, we tell you what can be removed, what can be suppressed and how long it will take. If the task cannot be done lawfully, we say so at the first meeting.
When you need it
If you recognise your situation, the check is either under way or about to start.
An old dispute at the top
A conflict with a partner or a dismissal from five years ago is still on the first page.
Court-record aggregators
Automated extracts without context: the case is closed, but in search it looks ongoing.
Anonymous publications
Channels and throwaway sites with inaccurate claims that copy one another.
Exposed personal data
Addresses, phone numbers and documents on lookup sites and in data leaks.
Review attacks
A wave of near-identical reviews about a company or its head in a short space of time.
Negative content in AI answers
An AI model retells an old article as the main fact about you.
IMG 033:2IMG 043:2What the work includes
The final scope is fixed in the contract after the audit. This is what a project usually covers.
- Negative content mapEvery unwanted source in the top 20, rated for risk and removability.
- Legal assessmentGrounds for removal: inaccuracy, Article 152 of the Russian Civil Code, personal data, the right to be forgotten.
- Pre-trial requestsRequests to site owners, hosting providers and search engines.
- De-indexingRemoving outdated information from search where the law allows.
- SuppressionTruthful sources that rank above the unwanted ones.
- Recurrence controlWe make sure removed content does not return as copies and mirrors.
Often combined with
One task is rarely solved with one tool. These services reinforce the result and are run by the same account lead.
Works withDigital profile building
Negative content can only be suppressed with accurate sources. That is what we create.
Learn more →
Works with24/7 mention monitoring
We track republications and copies of removed material within the first hours.
Learn more →
Works withReputation in AI answers
A removed article can live on in AI answers. We check that too.
Learn more →How we work
At every stage you see the result and receive a document.
Negative content audit
We find every unwanted source, copy and mirror.
5 working daysLegal assessment
We establish what can be removed, what can be suppressed and what needs explaining.
alongside the auditRemoval
Requests, de-indexing and, where needed, work with lawyers.
2–8 weeksSuppression
We create and promote sources that rank above the negative content.
2–6 monthsMonitoring
We watch for returning copies and new publications.
as contractedIMG 0521:9Checkpoints
We report on what has changed, not on how many pieces were published. Specific targets are fixed in the contract.
IMG 064:3- Unwanted sources drop out of the top 10 for key queries
- What can be removed is removed, not hidden
- AI models stop quoting outdated information
- A plan is in place in case of a repeat attack
On this topic
A similar case and an article from the knowledge base.
IMG 0116:10Negative content on a developer’s brand
Forums, review attacks and court records aggregators held 11 of the top 20 positions for the brand. Sales at a new development were behind plan.
IMG 0116:10Why an article can’t be removed “without a trace”, and what actually works
Copies, web archives, retellings and the Streisand effect. We look at the removal mechanisms that exist and why they are almost always combined with suppression.
2 October 2026 · 7 min readRead the article →Frequently asked questions
Can’t find yours? Ask it in your request and we will answer personally.
Can an article be removed completely?
Sometimes: if the information is inaccurate, unlawful or contains outdated personal data. But copies, archives and retellings cannot all be removed at once. That is why we almost always combine removal with suppression.
What is the Streisand effect and how do you avoid it?
It is when an attempt to hide information draws more attention to it. We do not threaten publications or start public battles: we work through legal procedures and quiet suppression.
How much does it cost to remove one link?
The price depends on the grounds, not the link: removal based on personal data and removal by court order are very different tasks. We quote an exact price after the audit.
Do you guarantee results?
We guarantee transparency: before we start, you know what can be removed, what cannot and how long it will take. “Guaranteed removal of everything” is a sign of fraud.
Will we need to go to court?
Usually not: most cases are resolved before trial. If court is needed, we bring in partner lawyers and discuss the risk of publicity in advance.
What if the negative content is true?
Then we do not hide the facts; we help add context: your position, the timeline, the outcome. We will not remove the truth, but we can build a complete picture around it.
Other services
Tell us about your situation. We reply within one business day.
The first meeting is free and carries no obligation. We sign an NDA before you share any details.